Minnesota and Arizona Bills Aim to Let Developers Skirt Apple's In-App Purchase Rules

Image: Collected
After North Dakota tried and didn't pass legislation that could have paved just how for third-party App Retail outlet options, Minnesota and Arizona have introduced new bills that could loosen Apple's control over ‌App Store‌ developers.

A good Minnesota bill shared by Star Tribune would force Apple and Google to keep products from Minnesotan creators on their app stores regardless if those developers promote them directly or through other channels, skirting current in-app purchase rules.

Supporters of the bill believe the bill allows developers in Minnesota to avoid the commissions collected by Apple and Google.

"A lot of men and women are worried about the increased impact and ability that Big Tech offers, and I think there's lots of interest found in trying to make certain that we have a fair and open digital economy," said Rep. Zack Stephenson, DFL-Coon Rapids, who is sponsoring the bill in the House.

Lobbyists for Apple and Google have got allegedly already started aiming to end the proposal. "They happen to be loading up," explained Minnesota Representative Zack Stephenson. "I understand that they have been calling a few of my colleagues. I heard whispers of this occurring through the entire Capitol. I think we acquired someone's attention."

Apple will not allow developers to work with their own in-app payment devices, instead requiring all programs that sell digital items and subscriptions to do so through Apple's in-app get program. Apple collects a 15 to thirty percent cost from all in-app purchases.

Under the terms of the Minnesota bill, Apple and Google would not be allowed to retaliate against a developer for using an alternative solution system to demand customers, which is a thing that Epic Games tried to accomplish last year. Epic attemptedto use a primary payment option, violating Apple's ‌App Shop‌ rules and leading to the Fortnite application being taken off the App Store.

A similar costs in Arizona would as well prevent developers from being forced to use Apple and Google's in-app purchase alternatives. As highlighted by The Information previously this week, the expenses was advanced by the Arizona House committee and can now visit a broader vote.

North Dakota's failed costs would have allowed for third-party App Stores, as well giving creators an alternative solution to Apple and Google's in-app purchase systems and fees, but it did not pass.

Apple Chief Privacy Engineer Erik Neuenschwander advocated against the North Dakota bill, telling the senate that it "threatens to destroy the iPhone you may already know it" by requiring changes that would "undermine the privacy, reliability, safety, and performance" of the ‌‌‌iPhone‌‌‌.

U.S. antitrust regulators this past year held an investigation into Apple's ‌App Retail store‌ fees and plans. The inquiry ultimately resulted in a 450 page article from the U.S. House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee recommending new antitrust laws to handle Apple's monopoly over program distribution on iOS units. That report hasn't yet led to any new laws.